While taking a vacation in Prague and Amsterdam,
from my vacation in Spain, I ran across the unexpected, education, reflection
and a dose of humility. During a couple of walking tours listening to different
tour directors I became aware of how hard people fought to be free of religious
domination. I know I studied this in school, how our founding fathers came here
for freedom, especially freedom of religion or from religion. It became a whole
lot more meaningful to me in the past few days, hearing the story of those left
behind to fight on their home ground. And it became increasing clear to me how
important it is that we not allow the churches or religious right to gain a
stronghold in or on our government. The Spanish Inquisition is one of many
examples of the dangers of allowing religious fanatics to gain power.
The second thing that became more real to me was the
Nazi occupation of both of these countries and the effect it had on them, not
only at the time of the occupation, but on the generations that came after. I
would Prague is believed to have one of the highest percentage of atheists in
the world. And Amsterdam can’t be far behind. Despite all the very old and
beautiful churches in Europe it seems far less religious than the United
States. It is hard for me to believe that some of this is the result of
witnessing what happened in Europe with the Nazi’s and during World War II.
Then after the Nazi’s came the communist. Eileen and I visited the Museum of Communism
in Prague, which ironically is next door to McDonalds and in the same building
on the same floor as a gambling parlor. One of the first thing that struck me
as we walked through this museum is how the communist used the exact same
strategy in creating fear of the United
States as the United States used to create fear of Communism, even the same
style of printmaking. The same fear mongering that has been building in the
United States since 9/11. The Us and Them. We have one asset the Europeans
didn’t have when fighting the church, the Nazis and the Communists, we have the
internet and social networking and it would probably be a good idea to protect
it.
Now to the humility part. Between the Museum of
Communism and the information from the tour guides I got a clearer idea of how
oppressive communism was under Stalin and Lenin and some of their replacements.
And I reflected back on how naïve and arrogant we were (or I was) when spouting
Marx and Mao and considering a few hundred thousand lives to be just the cost
of a better world. I had already decided that pure communism probably would
never work with human beings, because we do better with an incentive. I think
they figured this out in China when people were starving because the farmers
only produced what they were required to produce under the quota system and
there was no incentive to produce more. When China finally allowed them to sell
any amount they produced over their quota there started being more food to feed
the masses. But I think the ideas behind socialism are better than those behind
communism. I always did like Trotsky.
The problem with all the examples we have of
communism today is that they were all the result of a violent revolution and in
the heat of the revolution the ends justified the means allowing a few individuals
to be powerful when the revolution was won. And in each case power and paranoia
went to their heads.
I believe
every human beings basic need for food, shelter and health care need to be
provided. I hope the Occupy folks study history well and if they succeed they
have plans to implement a true democracy. I believe the United Stated and our
constitution was a good start, but somewhere along the way it got terribly off
track and the present state of the nation is a tad scary. Both Prague and Amsterdam
worship freedom. I learned a lot from my visit to these cities.
1 comment:
Hi Nancy
I agree that religion has been used to create much havoc in terms of genocide and creating "others" who are treated as "less than." But so have systems of race, class, gender and sexuality--no less harmful.
As I see it, oppression is a broader problem stemming from power. And by power, I mean two things
1. the ability to impose one's will on others despite their resistance
OR
2. the ability to define reality
So, those of us with power have to remain continuously alert to assure it is not used to squash, but to liberate others.
That is, in my opinion, why education is so essential. And, by education I do not refer to the curriculum that is merely the state's propaganda and other forms of social control.
True education seeks to empower individuals and there is always a paradoxical struggle--how to facilitate learning and keep the classroom (or institution) democratic with dignity for each individual.
No small task.
It is alternatively amusing and distressing for me when students resist democratic pedagogy--and they do because they are so used to being told what to learn and how to learn.
I have a number of London semester students who remain in a state of agitation because I won't tell them "What do you want us to get from this reading?" Now how would I know what value and/or information a 20 year old would take away from a text or a field trip? And they are more distressed when I insist that there are no right answers only well thought-out arguments based on clearly articulated assumptions.
As you probably tell I am in the midst of grading midterm essays and my head is again swirling.
Eileen
Post a Comment